Selective reporting in trials of high risk cardiovascular devices: cross sectional comparison between premarket approval summaries and published reports

نویسندگان

  • Lee Chang
  • Sanket S Dhruva
  • Janet Chu
  • Lisa A Bero
  • Rita F Redberg
چکیده

OBJECTIVE To investigate characteristics of clinical trials and results on safety and effectiveness reported in US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) documents for recently approved high risk cardiovascular devices compared with the characteristics and results reported in peer reviewed publications. DESIGN A search of the publicly available FDA database was performed for all cardiovascular devices that received premarket approval from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2010. For each study listed in the premarket approval documents, a Medline search was conducted to obtain the corresponding publication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical trial characteristics, primary endpoints, and safety and efficacy results in the FDA documents and corresponding publications. RESULTS 106 cardiovascular devices received premarket approval from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2010. FDA premarket approval documents for these devices contained 177 studies, of which 86 (49%) had been published by 1 January 2013. These 86 publications corresponded to 60 distinct devices. The mean time from FDA approval to publication in a peer reviewed journal was 6.5 months (range -4.8-7.5 years). In 22 (26%) of the 86 compared studies the number of participants enrolled in the study differed in the FDA summary and the corresponding publications. Of 152 primary endpoints identified in the FDA documents, in the corresponding publications three (2%) were labeled as secondary, 43 (28%) were unlabeled, and 15 (10%) were not found. Among the primary results, 69 (45%) were identical, 35 (23%) were similar, 17 (11%) were substantially different, and 31 (20%) could not be compared. CONCLUSIONS Many clinical trials for high risk cardiovascular devices approved by the FDA remain unpublished. Even when trials are published, the study population, primary endpoints, and results can differ substantially from data submitted to the FDA.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Gender bias in studies for Food and Drug Administration premarket approval of cardiovascular devices.

BACKGROUND Cardiovascular devices can have different safety and effectiveness profiles in men and women. The type and quality of sex-specific data reviewed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before approval of these devices are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS We performed a systematic review of the demographics, comments on gender bias, and analysis of results by sex for 78 high-risk card...

متن کامل

Regulatory approval of new medical devices: cross sectional study

OBJECTIVE  To investigate the regulatory approval of new medical devices. DESIGN  Cross sectional study of new medical devices reported in the biomedical literature. DATA SOURCES  PubMed was searched between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2004 to identify clinical studies of new medical devices. The search was carried out during this period to allow time for regulatory approval. ELIGIBILI...

متن کامل

The role of clinical trials in the Food and Drug Administration approval process for cardiovascular devices.

T he Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938 (the Act) required manufacturers to provide evidence of safety to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before drugs could be marketed. Amendments to the Act in 1962 added the requirement of demonstration of effectiveness to the condition for approval (21 CFR 314).1 The Medical Device Amendments of 1976 extended these controls to devices, establishing a...

متن کامل

Adherence to the CONSORT Statement in the Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials on Pharmacological Interventions Published in Iranian Medical Journals

Background: Among manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) form the backbone of evidence-based medicine. Hence, their protocol should be designed rigorously and their results should be reported clearly. To improve the quality of RCT reporting, researchers developed the CONSORT Statement in 1996 and updated it in 2010. This study was designed to assess th...

متن کامل

Improving the Postmarket Surveillance of Total Joint Arthroplasty Devices

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the FDA's approval process and postmarket surveillance strategies for THR devices. DESIGN The FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) 510k releasable database was used to document approved THR devices. The CDRH Medical Device Reporting data files were used to study the efficiency of the FDA's post-market surveillance system. Manufacturers were contacted to ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 350  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015